Applied AI
I don’t present from slides. Every workshop, course and conference session runs from a live page like this one, scrolling through real documents, real prompts and real results as we go. Afterwards everyone gets their own version of it: the same page, with the detail filled back in around each section, so the day is still there to work from weeks later.
This sample shows what that looks like. The pieces it’s built from, a demonstration laid out the way they all are, and something interactive to try.
1. The pieces
The same elements run through the live session and the notes you keep — the files going in, the prompts, the reasoning behind a model choice, the exact settings path, a run of numbered steps, and a glossary for anything unfamiliar.
Demo chat sessions
The demonstrations are spread fairly evenly between Claude and ChatGPT. You can still open the ones from a tool you don’t have an account with.
Prompts
Full prompt copy and run
Click “Full prompt” to see the whole text, and Copy to put it on your clipboard.
Model and effort
Model Effort
Why these settings
Complexity
High
Two long documents, with clauses that have to be cross-checked.Raises the model
Size
Medium
A 40-page PDF and a Word contract.Raises the effort
Risk of error
High
A wrong answer here has legal consequences.Raises both
So we chose
Model
High
Complexity and risk are both high, so this needs the most capable model, one that can hold two long documents in mind and catch the clause that doesn’t match.
Effort
3/5
There are only two files and the question is clear, so it doesn’t need the maximum thinking time. A middle setting keeps it careful without making you wait.
Picking the right model and effort for the job is a big part of using AI well — it shapes how good the answer is, how long it takes and what it costs. Click the small caption at the bottom right of a prompt to see which model and effort were used, and why.
Account settings
SettingsCreate a project
Personal ChatGPT Plus
Sidebar→New project→Name it
Workspace ChatGPT Business
Admin firstYour admin can switch Projects off for the workspace. If you can’t see New project, ask them.
Sidebar→New project→Name it
Personal Claude Pro
Sidebar→Projects→New project→Name it
Workspace Claude Team
No admin step: every member can create projects, and you can share a project with colleagues.
Sidebar→Projects→New project→Name it
Open this to see the steps for switching a feature on in your own account. Steps marked “Admin first” need your workspace owner to switch the feature on for the organisation.
Find it in your account
A shortcut to the page in your own account where the feature lives. It opens in a new tab, and you may be asked to sign in.
Numbered steps
Any series of steps gets its own outlined circle, so the order is obvious at a glance.
- Connect your world: link the apps, tools and services you already use.
- Morning brief: it reviews your connected apps and sends a short briefing on what matters most.
- Watch in the background: it checks your connected accounts every few hours and watches for items that need attention.
- Take on tasks: ask it to schedule meetings, build dashboards, create forecasts, prototype or draft follow-ups.
- Ask before acting: before it sends a message, makes a payment, signs a document or deletes anything, it shows you the exact action and waits for your approval.
- Notify and continue: it sends a notification when work is done or your review is needed, then carries on as needed.
Glossary
Open the glossary 81 terms
Agentic workflow
A sequence of steps in which the AI works towards an outcome, using skills, connectors and schedules and making judgement calls within limits you set.
AGI (Artificial General Intelligence)
A hypothetical form of AI with broad, human-like ability to learn, reason and solve problems across many different tasks.
AI adoption J-curve
A common pattern where productivity may dip at first as people learn AI, before improving once new habits and workflows settle in.
AI agent
A software system that carries out tasks on your behalf, taking several steps by itself within defined rules.
AI slop
Low-quality AI output that sounds plausible but has not been shaped or checked by someone who knows the situation.
Alignment
Getting an AI system to do what people actually want, not just what the instructions literally say.
Artifact
Something Claude makes for other people to use, such as a document, dashboard, slide deck, calculator or quiz, which opens beside the chat and can be shared as a link. ChatGPT’s equivalent is called a Site.
Augmented knowledge
A knowledge mode where the model improves its answer by using external information such as web search, connected apps, tools or databases.
Back-translation
Translating a translation back into the original language so a reader can check whether the meaning has drifted.
Bias
Systematic skew in AI outputs caused by patterns in training data, source material, system design or user prompting.
Branching chats
Starting a new chat from an earlier point in an existing conversation without changing the original thread.
Brief builder
A prompt scaffold that asks clarifying questions before turning a rough task into a stronger working brief.
Browser control
The AI reads a web page and acts on it by clicking, typing and filling in forms inside your own browser.
Capability gap
The gap between what the latest models can do and how people are actually using them.
Computer use
The AI opens an application on your computer and works through its screen one step at a time.
Connected apps
External services linked to a chatbot so the model can work with information from places such as email, calendars, documents or cloud storage.
Connector
A controlled link that lets the AI search and work with information held in another account or service, such as email.
Context
The information the model has to work with in a chat: your instructions, earlier messages, uploaded files and anything else you supply.
Context scaffolds
Reusable prompt structures that help the model understand the task, build a better brief and produce stronger outputs.
Context window
The model’s working memory within a single conversation, including any uploaded files.
Context window size
The amount of text, data, files and prior conversation the model can actively handle at once.
Cowork
The part of the Claude desktop app where Claude works on tasks with access to your files and tools, including scheduled tasks and recorded skills.
Custom instructions
Standing preferences that shape how ChatGPT responds, such as tone, spelling, formatting and style.
Deep research
A research mode in which the AI searches many sources over a longer time and returns a structured report.
Design system
A saved set of colours, fonts, logos and layout rules that Claude applies to visual materials.
Dictation
Speaking into the message box so your words are transcribed into text.
Effort (thinking effort)
How extensively the model works through a task before responding, from a quick answer to a more considered one.
ELIZA effect
The tendency to mistake a chatbot’s conversational style for real understanding, empathy or human-like awareness.
Frontier model
One of the most capable models currently available, which costs more per token than a lighter model.
Gap finder
A prompt scaffold that identifies what is missing, unclear, assumed or weak before work proceeds.
General knowledge
A knowledge mode where the model answers from its built-in training and the current chat, without live search or supplied source material.
Generative AI
AI that creates a new response in the moment from patterns it has learned, rather than retrieving a stored answer.
GitHub
A service that stores every version of a website or app’s code, so a change can be reviewed and rolled back.
Grounded documents
Documents supplied or nominated as source material so the model’s answer stays anchored to specific evidence.
Grounded knowledge
A knowledge mode where the model’s answer is anchored to specific documents, data or sources you provide.
Grounding
Basing the AI’s answer on specific material you provide, so it can be checked against that source.
Guardrails
Rules, filters or design controls intended to reduce harmful, unsafe, biased or inappropriate AI outputs.
Hallucination
When an AI presents false or made-up information as if it were true.
Human in the loop
Keeping a person responsible for reviewing, judging and owning the final output.
Inference
The process of producing an answer or conclusion from patterns, probabilities or supplied information.
Intelligence explosion
The hypothesis that once AI can improve itself, it could rapidly become more capable than humans.
Jailbreaking
Using adversarial or manipulative prompts to bypass a chatbot’s safety rules or behavioural controls.
Knowledge cut-off
The point where a model’s training stopped, so that it does not know anything that happened afterwards.
Knowledge grounding
Anchoring a model’s answer in specific, verifiable source material to improve accuracy and reduce drift.
Large language model (LLM)
The underlying AI model that powers chatbots by learning and generating language patterns at scale.
Library
ChatGPT’s file storage area where uploaded documents can be stored, found and reused across work.
Memory
Context that carries forward, within a conversation or between conversations, so work can build up over several steps.
Meta-prompting
Using a prompt to improve, rewrite or generate another prompt.
Microsoft 365 Copilot
A Microsoft application layer that brings AI assistance into Microsoft 365 tools, built on top of underlying AI models.
Model
The underlying AI engine that does the work. More capable models handle harder tasks, and lighter ones are faster and cheaper.
NotebookLM
Google’s source-grounded AI tool for working with a bounded set of documents and turning them into summaries, briefings, study aids or audio overviews.
Pattern-based learning
How a model learns: it picks up statistical relationships from very large amounts of text without storing the original material.
Plugin
An add-on that gives the AI an extra tool or ability.
Pre-mortem
A prompt scaffold that asks the model to assume a task has failed and identify the most likely causes.
Pre-trained
Already trained before you use it, so a conversation does not add new facts to the underlying model.
Project
A persistent workspace that keeps instructions, source documents and related conversations together for ongoing work.
Prompt
An instruction, question or task given to an AI model.
Prompt scaffold
A reusable prompt structure designed to make the model’s work clearer, stronger or more consistent.
Pull request
A proposed change to a website or app, held for a person to review and approve before it goes live.
Scheduled task
An instruction the AI runs automatically at a set time or on a recurring schedule.
Semi-structured information
Information with some organisation, such as headings or repeated fields, but no fully standard format.
Semi-structured information analysis
Using AI to analyse information with some organisation but inconsistent formatting, such as policies, product catalogues, quotes or reports.
Site
ChatGPT’s version of an artifact: an interactive website or lightweight app that ChatGPT builds, hosts and shares for you.
Skill
A reusable set of instructions for a task you repeat, made up of a name, a description and the steps to follow.
Source-grounded analysis
Analysis that stays tied to nominated documents, data or evidence instead of relying on general model knowledge.
Structured information
Information organised into consistent fields, such as spreadsheets, sales data and pricing tables.
Structured information analysis
Using AI to analyse information organised into consistent fields, such as spreadsheets, dashboards, lists or financial results.
Thinking modes
Different response modes that vary how much effort the model spends reasoning, checking and working through a task.
Token
The small piece of text a model actually processes, and the unit AI usage is metered and priced in.
Training data
The material used to teach a model patterns before it is released for use.
Training run
The one-off process where a model learns from training data and turns those patterns into model behaviour.
Transformer
The model architecture that helps an AI system read words in context rather than treating each word in isolation.
Unstructured information
Loose information with no fixed format, such as emails, reviews, transcripts and meeting notes.
Unstructured information analysis
Using AI to analyse loose information with no fixed format, such as emails, reviews, transcripts, complaints or meeting notes.
URL input
Supplying an open, static web link so a chatbot can fetch and read the content.
Version comparison
Using AI to compare two or more versions of a document and identify meaningful changes, additions, removals or risk shifts.
Vibe coding
Describing a change in plain language and letting the AI write the code to update a website or app.
Voice mode
A spoken conversation with the AI, where you talk and hear the answer back.
Web search
The AI looking things up on the internet during a chat to bring in current information.
Writing blocks
Editable sections inside a ChatGPT response that make it easier to draft and revise text without losing the working version.
Writing tells
Language patterns that can suggest AI involvement, especially when several appear together in over-polished or generic text.
Zeroth draft
The model’s first plausible output before proper human review, judgement and refinement.
Technical and AI terms used in the session are defined here in plain language. Open it to look up a term, and find the same glossary again in Further resources.
Index
When you get the notes afterwards, the index will already be open down the left, so you can jump straight to any section. This is what it looks like.
2. A worked example
Every demonstration is laid out this way, on screen during the session and again in your notes: the files going in, the prompt, the reasoning behind the model and effort setting, and the response worked through point by point.
Walking through a process
This is a request for quote that came in, along with the two documents you'd normally answer it with. I don't ask the AI to write the response. It works as a coach: one section at a time, starting with what's mandatory, checking what we've given it before moving on.
Model Effort
Why these settings
Complexity
High
A formal request with an addendum and a template, where one missed requirement can cost the submission.Raises the model
Size
High
Three long, formal documents read together.Raises the effort
Risk of error
High
A competitive submission with a hard deadline.Raises both
So we chose
Model
High
It has to track requirements across all three documents at once and notice where they disagree.
Effort
4/5
It works section by section, so it is worth giving it time on each one.
Full prompt
Claude's response
An illustrative example. The documents and figures are made up.
It starts by checking where the addendum overrides the original
Four points changed after the RFQ was issued, so every answer below is checked against the addendum rather than the original:
- Contract term. Now 1 July 2027 to 30 June 2029, with a further one-year option.
- Insurance. The public liability minimum has risen from $10 million to $20 million.
- Pricing. Rates must now be quoted inclusive of travel. The original listed travel separately.
- Submission. Lodgement moved to the online portal; emailed responses will not be accepted.
It also finds two things neither document settles
- A date that can't be right. Section 4.2 asks for services to commence "from 1 July 2026", which is a year before the contract term in the addendum. Almost certainly meant to be 2027.
- A section that doesn't exist. The checklist in Attachment A lists "6. Transition plan", but Part B has no section 6. It will have to be covered under 5(c).
Section 1: mandatory requirements, pass or fail
This section is not scored. The RFQ says failure on any mandatory item makes the submission non-conforming and liable to exclusion, so it works through these first.
A question it asks
List each required insurance with the insurer, the limit and the expiry date, and confirm you can attach current certificates of currency.
It accepts the first three and flags the fourth as unconfirmed rather than letting it through.
It marks a thin answer rather than accepting it
Asked for evidence of comparable work, the answer offered two projects without dates or referees. It rated the section amber and said exactly what was missing: contract value, delivery dates, and a named referee for each, since the RFQ asks for contactable references from the past three years.
It finishes with what still has to be settled
- Confirm whether the commencement date is 2026 or 2027.
- Confirm the product liability position with the broker.
- Decide who signs off the proposed departures from the standard terms.
- Register for the portal early: first-time registration can take two business days.
Before we start on any section, I've read the three documents against each other. Here's what I found.
Where the addendum overrides the RFQ
- Contract term. The RFQ says two years from 1 July 2026. Addendum 1 replaces this with 1 July 2027 to 30 June 2029, plus a one-year option. Use the addendum dates throughout.
- Insurance. Public liability rises from $10 million to $20 million. Check your certificate before we answer section 1.
- Pricing. Rates are now all-inclusive of travel. If your internal rates exclude travel, they will need rebuilding before they go in the table.
- Lodgement. Online portal only. Emailed responses will not be accepted.
Things neither document settles
Section 4.2 asks for commencement "from 1 July 2026". That is a year before the contract term in the addendum, so it is almost certainly a drafting error left over from the original timetable. Worth a clarification question rather than an assumption.
The Attachment A checklist lists a section 6, "Transition plan", which does not appear in the Part B template. I would cover it under 5(c) and say so explicitly, so the panel can find it.
Section 1: Mandatory requirements
This section is pass or fail, not scored. The RFQ is explicit that failure on any mandatory criterion makes the submission non-conforming and liable to exclusion, so it is worth being slower here than anywhere else.
The panel will be checking four things: current insurances at the levels in the addendum, a conforming response lodged through the portal before the deadline, signed acknowledgement of the addendum, and evidence of comparable work in the past three years.
What I need from you
- Each required insurance, with insurer, limit and expiry, and confirmation you can attach certificates of currency.
- Confirmation that someone has registered for the portal.
- Two or three comparable projects, each with contract value, delivery dates and a contactable referee.
Three of the four insurances are fine. Product liability is unconfirmed, and the RFQ lists it as mandatory, so that is a hard blocker until your broker confirms it in writing. I would raise it today rather than the week before lodgement.
On comparable work, I have project names but nothing the panel can assess or verify. The RFQ asks for contactable references from the past three years. Before we draft this, each project needs a contract value, delivery dates, and a named referee with a current phone number and email.
I would rate this section amber: it will pass once the insurance and the references are settled, but it does not pass as it stands.
Still to be settled
- Confirm whether commencement is 2026 or 2027 — a clarification question to the contact officer.
- Confirm the product liability position with your broker, in writing.
- Decide who signs off the proposed departures from the standard terms.
- Register for the portal early. First-time registration can take up to two business days, and that sits outside your control.
Once the insurance position and the three referees are confirmed, we can draft section 1 and move on to section 2.
3. Something to try
An interactive piece, built into the page. This one walks through picking a model and a thinking effort level for a task — move the sliders and watch the recommendation change.
ExploreChoosing a model and thinking effort
Everything here stays live. The prompts can be copied and run, the settings paths go to your own account, the demonstrations open in full, and the interactive pieces work as they did on the day — so the session isn’t something you had to take notes on, it’s something you can come back to and use.
This is a sample rather than a real session. The page you receive is built from your own documents, your own questions and the demonstrations we actually ran.